REINFORM / EQUESTRIAN APPAREL RSL TESTING BRIEF
Worksheet revision: 2026-10-20
Source: https://reinformm.com/fieldnotes/rsl-testing-equestrian-apparel

Blank buyer planning record. Not a laboratory protocol, universal test panel,
certificate or legal determination. Agree technical scope with the laboratory.

DECISION AND REQUIREMENTS
Buyer / responsible technical reviewer:
Style / revision / intended user and age group:
Destination country or countries (separate EU, UK and US review):
Expected placement timing:
Brand RSL document and version:
Legal requirements reviewed / reviewer / review date:
Decision this work must support:

COMPONENT REGISTER (REPEAT FOR EACH DISTINCT MATERIAL)
Component code / location / drawing reference:
Supplier / material reference / composition:
Colour / dye reference / finish / decoration process:
Sample origin: development yardage / decorated panel / prototype / production lot:
Lot or batch identity, if applicable:
Required evidence / existing report reference:
Open questions / owner / due date:

LABORATORY SCOPE CONFIRMATION
Laboratory / contact:
Components and colours included:
Proposed tests / methods / reporting limits / acceptance criteria:
Sample quantity and preparation instructions:
Grouping or exclusions agreed with laboratory:
Any component or requirement not covered:
Sample dispatch and expected report dates:
Quote / additional-work approval / report recipients:

REPORT AND RELEASE REVIEW
Complete report number / date / version:
Sample identity matched to register?:
Methods and scope matched to instruction?:
Results and acceptance reviewed by:
Coverage gaps / clarification / follow-up:
Status: awaiting review / accepted for named scope / clarification required /
additional work required / not accepted
Exact approved BOM and material references:
Decision / approver / date:

CHANGE CONTROL
Proposed substitution or process change:
Affected style / colour / order / shipments:
Evidence impact reviewed with:
Required additional work:
Approved replacement reference and revision:

Keep physical performance, fit and marketing-claim approvals separate.